OpenAI Text-to-Speech vs Play.ht
The best way to compare OpenAI Text-to-Speech vs Play.ht: audio samples, latency, features, plans, pricing, and more.
OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Play.ht
Voice Quality
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples
Play.ht Samples
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derivedfrom comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features
Play.ht Features
Features - Conclusion
- Comprehensive Features: Play.ht: In comparing the features of OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Play.ht, it's evident that Play.ht offers a more comprehensive suite of features, including voice cloning, per-word timestamps, speed control, and support for phone formats, which OpenAI Text-to-Speech lacks. Additionally, Play.ht supports multi-lingual capabilities similar to OpenAI but extends its functionality with more user control options like pitch and speed adjustments. This makes Play.ht a more versatile and customizable option for users needing advanced text-to-speech services.
Pricing & Plans
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing
Pay As You Go
$15/mo
- 1M characters
- Optimized for speed
Pay As You Go (TTS HD)
$30/mo
- 1M characters
- Optimized for quality
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0 / mo
- 10,000 characters
Starter
$5 /mo
- 10,000 characters
- 30,000 characters
Creator
$22 /mo
- 100,000 characters
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
- Cost-Effective Solution: OpenAI Text-to-Speech: OpenAI Text-to-Speech emerges as the most cost-effective option for scalable or significant text-to-speech needs, offering the lowest price at a flat rate for any volume of usage. While Play.ht provides a free plan for users with minimal requirements, its paid plans are considerably more expensive compared to OpenAI's offering. For those prioritizing budget over additional features, OpenAI Text-to-Speech presents the best value.
Customer Reviews
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Reviews
Play.ht Reviews
Customers appreciate Amazon Polly for its natural-sounding voices, ease of use, and integration with AWS services. They find it beneficial for various applications like IVR systems, content creation, and multilingual support. However, concerns about cost, limited customization options, and occasional unnatural inflections in the voices are common. The service's scalability and fast response times are highlighted as significant advantages, helping businesses efficiently manage large-scale projects.
Compare Alternatives
OpenAI Text-to-Speech Alternatives
Summary
- Different User Needs: OpenAI vs. Play.ht: When comparing OpenAI Text-to-Speech and Play.ht, it's clear that each service caters to different user needs and preferences. OpenAI Text-to-Speech offers a more cost-effective solution for users with extensive text-to-speech requirements, while Play.ht stands out with its superior range of features, including voice cloning and speed control, making it a more versatile choice for those seeking advanced customization options.
- Overall Recommendation: Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on the user's specific needs regarding voice quality, feature set, and budget. OpenAI Text-to-Speech is ideal for users seeking cost-effectiveness, while Play.ht is better suited for those needing advanced features and greater customization.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy low latency websocket support and mult-speaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at onespeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Do you offer any free credits for TTS & ASR?
We offer a generous free plan for developers with one month of free:
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of speech-to-text transcription
What is the monthly subscription?
Our monthly plan is $20 per month for
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of Speech-to-Text transcription
Once you exceed those limits, you can add $5 top-ups to your plan for
- additional 30hrs of Text-to-Speech
- additional 300,000 characters of Speech-to-Text
Do you offer voices & transcription other in languages?
We currently only have English voice generation & transcription. But we're working on multilingual voice support, expected to roll out in 2-3 months.
Can I create custom voices (voice cloning)?
Please contact us at founders@snr.audio with your custom voice (voice cloning) usecase. Once approved by our compliance team, you will get access to your custom voice in under 48-72 hours.
Can I use the generated audio & transcription commercially?
Yes, audio & transcription generated with Signal Noise Labs can be used commercially. You own the license to the generated content to perpetuity.
How do I cancel my subscription?
You can cancel your subscription at any time. Go to the Subscription panel in the dashboard and click the "Cancel Subscription" button.
app.snr.audio
SNR.Audio - Text to Speech and Speech to Text
