Play.ht vs Murf API
The best way to compare Play.ht vs Murf API: audio samples, latency, features, plans, pricing, and more.
Play.ht
Murf API
Voice Quality
Play.ht Samples
Murf API Samples
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derivedfrom comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Play.ht Features
Murf API Features
Features - Conclusion
- Shared Features: Both Play.ht and Murf API provide essential text-to-speech functionalities such as voice cloning, multi-lingual support, speed control, and compatibility with various phone formats, catering to a broad range of user needs.
- Play.ht Unique Feature: Play.ht offers per-word timestamps, enhancing its utility for projects that require precise synchronization between text and spoken audio, such as subtitle generation or timed presentations.
- Murf API Unique Feature: Murf API includes pitch control, allowing users to adjust the tonal quality of the voice, which is particularly useful for creating more dynamic and varied voice outputs.
- Choosing the Right Service: The decision between Play.ht and Murf API should be based on specific user requirements. If detailed audio editing and precise timing are crucial, Play.ht’s per-word timestamps make it the better choice. If voice modulation and tonal adjustments are important, Murf API’s pitch control offers the necessary flexibility.
Pricing & Plans
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0 / mo
- 10,000 characters
Starter
$5 /mo
- 10,000 characters
- 30,000 characters
Creator
$22 /mo
- 100,000 characters
Murf API Pricing
API Subscription
$3000/year
- 12M characters (per year)
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
- Play.ht Pricing Flexibility: Play.ht provides competitive and flexible pricing plans that cater to a wide range of usage levels. From a free tier for low-usage customers to high-usage plans, Play.ht offers cost-effective solutions that are significantly more affordable than many competitors.
- Murf API Pricing Structure: Murf API's pricing is based on a straightforward annual plan. This model may appeal to users with consistent, high-volume needs, but it generally comes at a higher cost compared to the tiered pricing models of Play.ht.
- Cost Comparison: When comparing the cost across various usage scenarios, Play.ht is more economical, offering lower prices not only for entry-level users but also for those with extensive text-to-speech requirements.
- Overall Value: Play.ht emerges as the more cost-effective choice, providing better value across different usage levels. This makes it an attractive option for users ranging from those just starting out to large enterprises seeking efficient text-to-speech services.
Customer Reviews
Play.ht Reviews
Customers appreciate Amazon Polly for its natural-sounding voices, ease of use, and integration with AWS services. They find it beneficial for various applications like IVR systems, content creation, and multilingual support. However, concerns about cost, limited customization options, and occasional unnatural inflections in the voices are common. The service's scalability and fast response times are highlighted as significant advantages, helping businesses efficiently manage large-scale projects.
Murf API Reviews
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Compare Alternatives
Play.ht Alternatives
Murf API Alternatives
Summary
- Voice Quality and Features: Both Play.ht and Murf API deliver high-quality text-to-speech services, each with their own unique strengths that cater to various user needs. Play.ht provides specialized features such as per-word timestamps, enhancing its versatility for projects requiring precise synchronization.
- Play.ht Pricing and Versatility: Play.ht is noted for its competitive pricing structure, which offers flexibility across a spectrum of usage levels—from low to high volume. This makes it an accessible option for a broad range of users, from individuals to large organizations.
- Murf API's Specific Strengths: Murf API distinguishes itself with features like pitch control, which allows users to fine-tune the voice's tonal qualities. This is particularly useful for applications needing specific voice modulation. Additionally, its straightforward high-volume plan appeals to users with consistent high-usage demands, though it comes at a higher cost.
- Overall Suitability: While Play.ht is ideal for users looking for cost-effective and versatile text-to-speech solutions, Murf API is better suited for those who require detailed voice control or have high, consistent usage needs and are willing to invest more financially.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy low latency websocket support and mult-speaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at onespeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Do you offer any free credits for TTS & ASR?
We offer a generous free plan for developers with one month of free:
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of speech-to-text transcription
What is the monthly subscription?
Our monthly plan is $20 per month for
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of Speech-to-Text transcription
Once you exceed those limits, you can add $5 top-ups to your plan for
- additional 30hrs of Text-to-Speech
- additional 300,000 characters of Speech-to-Text
Do you offer voices & transcription other in languages?
We currently only have English voice generation & transcription. But we're working on multilingual voice support, expected to roll out in 2-3 months.
Can I create custom voices (voice cloning)?
Please contact us at founders@snr.audio with your custom voice (voice cloning) usecase. Once approved by our compliance team, you will get access to your custom voice in under 48-72 hours.
Can I use the generated audio & transcription commercially?
Yes, audio & transcription generated with Signal Noise Labs can be used commercially. You own the license to the generated content to perpetuity.
How do I cancel my subscription?
You can cancel your subscription at any time. Go to the Subscription panel in the dashboard and click the "Cancel Subscription" button.
app.snr.audio
SNR.Audio - Text to Speech and Speech to Text
