IBM Watson vs Play.ht
The best way to compare IBM Watson vs Play.ht: audio samples, latency, features, plans, pricing, and more.
IBM Watson
Play.ht
Voice Quality
IBM Watson Samples
Play.ht Samples
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derivedfrom comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
IBM Watson Features
Play.ht Features
Features - Conclusion
- Both IBM Watson and Play.ht offer a range of features that cater to various text-to-speech needs, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, and support for phone formats.
- However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with pitch control, a feature not available in Play.ht, potentially offering a more customizable listening experience.
- On the other hand, both platforms provide speed control, ensuring users can adjust the playback speed to their preference.
Pricing & Plans
IBM Watson Pricing
Free
$0/mo
- 10,000 characters
Standard
$20/mo
- 1M characters
Play.ht Pricing
Free
$0 / mo
- 10,000 characters
Starter
$5 /mo
- 10,000 characters
- 30,000 characters
Creator
$22 /mo
- 100,000 characters
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
- In a pricing comparison between IBM Watson and Play.ht, IBM Watson emerges as the more cost-effective option for users with high-volume text-to-speech needs, offering the lowest cost at its Standard Plan level.
- While Play.ht provides more flexibility with its Free, Creator, and Unlimited Plans, its cost is significantly higher, especially for those on the Creator Plan.
- For those prioritizing budget over specific features, IBM Watson's straightforward and economical pricing structure makes it a compelling choice.
Customer Reviews
IBM Watson Reviews
Play.ht Reviews
Customers appreciate Amazon Polly for its natural-sounding voices, ease of use, and integration with AWS services. They find it beneficial for various applications like IVR systems, content creation, and multilingual support. However, concerns about cost, limited customization options, and occasional unnatural inflections in the voices are common. The service's scalability and fast response times are highlighted as significant advantages, helping businesses efficiently manage large-scale projects.
Compare Alternatives
IBM Watson Alternatives
Summary
- In comparing IBM Watson and Play.ht for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson stands out for its cost-effectiveness and additional feature of pitch control, making it a suitable choice for users with high-volume needs and a desire for customizable voice modulation.
- Play.ht, however, offers slightly higher voice quality ratings across fiction, non-fiction, and conversation categories, alongside a more flexible pricing structure with its Free, Creator, and Unlimited Plans.
- Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's specific priorities, whether they lean towards budget, voice quality, or the need for specific features like pitch control and multi-lingual support.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy low latency websocket support and mult-speaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at onespeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Do you offer any free credits for TTS & ASR?
We offer a generous free plan for developers with one month of free:
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of speech-to-text transcription
What is the monthly subscription?
Our monthly plan is $20 per month for
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of Speech-to-Text transcription
Once you exceed those limits, you can add $5 top-ups to your plan for
- additional 30hrs of Text-to-Speech
- additional 300,000 characters of Speech-to-Text
Do you offer voices & transcription other in languages?
We currently only have English voice generation & transcription. But we're working on multilingual voice support, expected to roll out in 2-3 months.
Can I create custom voices (voice cloning)?
Please contact us at founders@snr.audio with your custom voice (voice cloning) usecase. Once approved by our compliance team, you will get access to your custom voice in under 48-72 hours.
Can I use the generated audio & transcription commercially?
Yes, audio & transcription generated with Signal Noise Labs can be used commercially. You own the license to the generated content to perpetuity.
How do I cancel my subscription?
You can cancel your subscription at any time. Go to the Subscription panel in the dashboard and click the "Cancel Subscription" button.
app.snr.audio
SNR.Audio - Text to Speech and Speech to Text
