Unreal Speech vs Lovo AI
The best way to compare Unreal Speech vs Lovo AI: audio samples, latency, features, plans, pricing, and more.
Unreal Speech
Lovo AI
Voice Quality
Unreal Speech Samples
Lovo AI Samples
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derivedfrom comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.
Features
Unreal Speech Features
Lovo AI Features
Features - Conclusion
- LOVO AI Features: Provides voice cloning and multilingual capabilities, enhancing its utility for personalized and global applications. However, it lacks per-word timestamps, pitch control, and support for phone formats, which could limit its application in more technical or synchronized settings.
- Unreal Speech Capabilities: Offers per-word timestamps, essential for creating accurate subtitles and syncing speech accurately in multimedia applications. Additionally, it supports pitch and speed control, and is compatible with phone formats, making it highly versatile for uses in IVR systems and other telecommunications applications.
- Overall: While LOVO AI excels in creating personalized and accessible multi-language content, Unreal Speech provides a more comprehensive toolset for detailed audio customization and synchronization, catering effectively to a broader range of technical requirements.
Pricing & Plans
Unreal Speech Pricing
Free
$0/mo
- 250,000 characters
Basic
$49/mo
- 3M characters
- Extra: $16 per 1M chars
Plus
$499/mo
- 42M characters
- Extra: $12 per 1M chars
Pro
$1499/mo
- 150M characters
- Extra: $10 per 1M chars
Enterprise
$4999/mo
- 625M characters
- Extra: $8 per 1M chars
Lovo AI Pricing
Free
$0/mo
- 250,000 characters
Basic
$29/mo
- 2 hours (~80K chars)
Pro
$48/mo
- 5 hours (~200K chars)
Pro+
$149/mo
- 20 hours (~800K chars)
Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
- Free Tier Comparison: Unreal Speech provides a generous free tier with 250,000 characters, substantially more than LOVO AI's equivalent of approximately 3,000 characters in 5 minutes of audio. This makes Unreal Speech an appealing option for users just starting with text-to-speech services.
- Cost Effectiveness at Paid Tiers: Unreal Speech maintains a more affordable rate across its paid tiers, offering a lower cost per million characters which further decreases as plan sizes increase. This contrasts sharply with LOVO AI, which lacks a free tier and starts its pricing at $29 for a significantly smaller character limit.
- Comparison of Pro Plans: At the Pro plan level, Unreal Speech provides 15 times the characters for the same price as LOVO AI, highlighting its superior value for money, especially for users with substantial text-to-speech needs.
- Overall Pricing Advantage: Unreal Speech's pricing model is highly economical, especially for users requiring large volumes of text-to-speech conversion, making it a more cost-effective choice over LOVO AI for both small-scale and large-scale projects.
Customer Reviews
Unreal Speech Reviews
Customers appreciate Unreal Speech's Text-to-Speech API for its affordability, ease of setup, and generous free tier. They find the API to be a cost-effective solution compared to competitors, with clear documentation and responsive customer support. The API is praised for its natural-sounding voices and seamless integration into various projects. However, customers express a desire for more voice customization options, support for multiple languages and improvements in voice realism.
Lovo AI Reviews
Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.
Compare Alternatives
Unreal Speech Alternatives
Lovo AI Alternatives
Summary
- Cost-Effectiveness of Unreal Speech: Offers a more economical solution across its pricing tiers, particularly beneficial for users requiring large volumes of text-to-speech content. This affordability extends from small-scale to enterprise-level needs, ensuring users receive more value for their investment.
- Feature Set of Unreal Speech: Includes valuable tools such as per-word timestamps, pitch, and speed control, which are crucial for a wide range of applications, from educational content to dynamic media productions. These features enhance the user experience by allowing precise control over voice outputs.
- Comparison with LOVO AI: While LOVO AI excels in voice cloning and multilingual support, it lacks the broader feature set and pricing flexibility that Unreal Speech provides. This can limit its appeal to users who need more comprehensive functionality alongside cost efficiency.
- Overall Value: Unreal Speech not only offers more competitive pricing but also a richer set of features, making it a more attractive option for extensive text-to-speech conversion projects. Its ability to cater to diverse needs without imposing high costs makes it a standout choice in the market.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy low latency websocket support and mult-speaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.
TTS Property
Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at onespeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoyspeaker voice generation at pricing that helps you scale.Our next-gen TTS model surpasses competitors on performance at one-tenth the cost. Enjoy
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Signal Noise Ratio
Do you offer any free credits for TTS & ASR?
We offer a generous free plan for developers with one month of free:
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of speech-to-text transcription
What is the monthly subscription?
Our monthly plan is $20 per month for
- 160 hours of text-to-speech generation
- 1.2 million characters of Speech-to-Text transcription
Once you exceed those limits, you can add $5 top-ups to your plan for
- additional 30hrs of Text-to-Speech
- additional 300,000 characters of Speech-to-Text
Do you offer voices & transcription other in languages?
We currently only have English voice generation & transcription. But we're working on multilingual voice support, expected to roll out in 2-3 months.
Can I create custom voices (voice cloning)?
Please contact us at founders@snr.audio with your custom voice (voice cloning) usecase. Once approved by our compliance team, you will get access to your custom voice in under 48-72 hours.
Can I use the generated audio & transcription commercially?
Yes, audio & transcription generated with Signal Noise Labs can be used commercially. You own the license to the generated content to perpetuity.
How do I cancel my subscription?
You can cancel your subscription at any time. Go to the Subscription panel in the dashboard and click the "Cancel Subscription" button.
app.snr.audio
SNR.Audio - Text to Speech and Speech to Text
